Hypothesis does its level best to be compatible with everything you could possibly need it to be compatible with. Generally you should just try it and expect it to work. If it doesn’t, you can be surprised and check this document for the details.
Hypothesis has quite wide version support. It is supported and tested on python 2.7 and python 3.2+. Supporting 3.0 or 3.1 wouldn’t be infeasible but I’d need a good reason to. Python 2.6 is supported on a “best effort” basis. It is supported in the 1.7.x versions of Hypothesis and will most likely continue being supported through all of the 1.x versions, however I’m not committing to that.
Hypothesis also supports PyPy (PyPy3 should also work but isn’t part of the CI at the moment), and should support 32-bit and narrow builds, though this is currently only tested on Windows.
No testing has been performed on Jython or IronPython. It might work but I’d be surprised. Let me know if you need these supported. It might be possible but I make no promises.
In theory Hypothesis should work anywhere that Python does. In practice it is only known to work and regularly tested on OS X, Windows and Linux, and you may experience issues running it elsewhere. For example a known issue is that FreeBSD splits out the python-sqlite package from the main python package, and you will need to install that in order for it to work.
If you’re using something else and it doesn’t work, do get in touch and I’ll try to help, but unless you can come up with a way for me to run a CI server on that operating system it probably won’t stay fixed due to the inevitable march of time.
In general Hypothesis goes to quite a lot of effort to generate things that look like normal Python test functions that behave as closely to the originals as possible, so it should work sensibly out of the box with every test framework.
In terms of what’s actually known to work:
- Hypothesis integrates as smoothly with py.test and unittest as I can make it, and this is verified as part of the CI.
- Nose has been tried at least once and works fine, and I’m aware of people who use Hypothesis with Nose, but this isn’t tested as part of the CI.
- Integration with Django’s testing requires use of the Hypothesis for Django users package. The issue is that in Django’s tests’ normal mode of execution it will reset the database one per test rather than once per example, which is not what you want.
Coverage works out of the box with Hypothesis (and Hypothesis has 100% branch coverage in its own tests). However you should probably not use Coverage, Hypothesis and PyPy together. Because Hypothesis does quite a lot of CPU heavy work compared to normal tests, it really exacerbates the performance problems the two normally have working together.